1.IntroductionAs described by Duke-Elder,1 the theories of human anatomy that were prevalent during the mideighteenth century proposed that the vitreous is composed of “loose and delicate filaments surrounded by fluid,” a description that is remarkably close to present-day concepts. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries there were no less than four very different theories of vitreous structure. In 1741 Demours formulated the alveolar theory, claiming that there are alveoli of fluid between fibrillar structures. In 1780, Zinn proposed that the vitreous is arranged in a concentric, lamellar configuration similar to the layers of an onion. The dissections and histologic preparations of Von Pappenheim and Brucke provided evidence for this lamellar theory. The radial sector theory was proposed by Hannover in 1845. Studying coronal sections at the equator, he described a multitude of sectors that are approximately radially oriented around the central anteroposterior core that contains Cloquet’s canal. Hannover likened this structure to the appearance of a cut orange. In 1848 Sir William Bowman established the fibrillar theory, which was based upon his finding microscopic fibrils, an observation that confirmed Retzius’s earlier description of fibers that arose in the peripheral anterior vitreous and assumed an undulating pattern in the central vitreous, similar to a horse’s tail. In 1917 the elegant histological preparations of Szent-Gyo¨rgi supported these observations and introduced the concept that vitreous structure changes with age. Unfortunately, the techniques employed in all these studies were flawed by artifacts that biased the results of the investigations. As pointed out by Redslob,2 these early histological studies employed acidic tissue fixatives that precipitated what we recognize today as the glycosaminoglycan, hyaluronan, formerly called hyaluronic acid; an effect that altered the histological imaging of the vitreous. Thus the development of slit-lamp biomicroscopy by Gullstrand in 1912 held great promise, as it was anticipated that this technique could enable imaging of the vitreous structure without the introduction of fixation artifacts. Yet, as described by Redslob,2 a varied set of descriptions resulted over the years, ranging from a fibrous structure to sheets, “chain-linked fences,” and various other interpretations. This problem has even persisted in more recent investigations. Eisner3 described “membranelles”; Worst,4 “cisterns”; Sebag and Balazs,5 “fibers”; and Kishi and Shimizu,6 “pockets” in the vitreous. The observation of these so-called “pockets” by the last-mentioned group was ultimately found to be an age-related phenomenon with little relevance to the normal macromolecular structure.7 Previously considered a vestigial organ, the vitreous is now regarded as an important ocular structure,8 9 at least with respect to several important pathological conditions of the posterior segment. This remarkable tissue is in essence an extended extracellular matrix, composed largely of water, with a very small amount of structural macromolecules.9 10 Nevertheless, in the normal state it is a solid and clear gel, especially in youth (Fig. 1). Because of the predominance of water within the vitreous, effective imaging of this structure in vitro is best performed by methods that overcome the intended transparency of this tissue yet avoid dehydration. Imaging the vitreous in vivo is must likely best achieved by visualizing the macroscopic features via an assessment of the nature and organization of the molecular components. The following discussion summarizes present concepts of vitreous structure and reviews some of the most important methods available and in development for imaging the vitreous in vitro and in vivo. 2.Vitreous AnatomyIn an emmetropic, adult human eye, the vitreous body (Fig. 2) is approximately 16.5 mm in axial length, with a depression anteriorly just behind the lens known as the patellar fossa. The hyaloideo-capsular ligament of Weiger is the annular region of vitreo-lenticular attachment that is 1 to 2 mm in width and 8 to 9 mm in diameter. Erggelet’s or Berger’s space is at the center of the hyaloideo-capsular ligament. Arising from this space and coursing posteriorly through the central vitreous is the canal of Cloquet [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3(g)], the former site of the hyaloid artery in the embryonic vitreous. What was previously the lumen of this artery is now an area devoid of collagen fibrils, surrounded by multifenestrated sheaths that were previously the basal laminae of the hyaloid artery wall. Posteriorly, Cloquet’s canal opens into a funnel-shaped region anterior to the optic disk known as the area of Martegiani. A remnant of incomplete regression of the hyaloid artery can persist in this location and is called Bergmeister’s papilla. The peripheral shell of the vitreous body, known as the vitreous cortex, courses anterior and posterior to the vitreous base. The portion that courses forward and inward from the vitreous base is called the anterior vitreous cortex. The portion coursing posteriorly from the posterior border of the vitreous base is known as the posterior vitreous cortex. The posterior vitreous cortex is 100 to 110 μm thick and consists of densely packed type II collagen fibrils and other extracellular matrix components. Contrary to previous beliefs, there are no direct connections between the posterior vitreous cortex and the retina. Yet, the posterior vitreous cortex is quite adherent to the internal limiting lamina (ILL) of the retina, especially in youth.11 The exact nature of this adhesion is not known, but most probably results from the action of the various extracellular matrix molecules found at this interface.12 3.Imaging the Vitreous3.1.In Vitro ImagingDark-field slit microscopy of a whole human vitreous in the fresh, unfixed state was extensively employed by Sebag and Balazs to characterize the fibrous structure of the vitreous13 (Fig. 3), age-related changes within the central vitreous body14 and at the vitreoretinal interface,11 and the effects of diabetes on the human vitreous structure.15 16 This imaging method has successfully demonstrated the anatomy of the posterior vitreous cortex (Fig. 4) and the fibers in the anterior peripheral vitreous (Fig. 5) that transmit traction to the peripheral retina in rhegmatogenous retinal pathology. Fibers in this region also play a role in the formation of the so-called “anterior loop” configuration of anterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Pathological fibers,16 believed to be the consequence of nonenzymatic glycation of vitreous collagen fibrils,17 were also visualized in cases of diabetic vitreopathy (Fig. 6). The reason that these normal and pathological structures are visible with dark-field slit microscopy is that this technique achieves a 90-deg illumination-observation angle that maximizes the Tyndall effect. One of the major challenges to in vivo imaging of the vitreous is the limitation imposed by the size of the pupil and the anatomy of the anterior segment, which work against achieving such a wide illumination-observation angle. 3.2.In Vivo Imaging3.2.1.BiomicroscopyThe effective use of slit-lamp biomicroscopy to overcome vitreous transparency necessitates maximizing the Tyndall effect. Although this can be achieved in vitro, as described earlier, there are limitations to the illumination-observation angle that can be achieved clinically. This is even more troublesome in the presence of meiosis, corneal and/or lenticular opacities, and limited patient cooperation. Essential to the success of achieving an adequate Tyndall effect are maximizing pupil dilation in the patient, since the Tyndall effect increases with an increasingly subtended angle between the plane of illumination and the line of observation (up to a maximum of 90 deg, as in dark-field slit-lamp microscopy in vitro), and dark adaptation in the examiner. Some observers claim that green light enhances the Tyndall effect, although this has never been explained or tested scientifically. Preset lens biomicroscopy slightly increases the available illumination-observation angle, offers dynamic inspection of the vitreous in vivo, and provides the capability of recording the findings in real time.18 Initially introduced on a wide scale for use with a Hruby lens and currently practiced by using a hand-held 90-diopter lens at the slit lamp, this technique is purportedly best performed with a fundus camera and the El Bayadi-Kajiura lens promoted by Schepens, Trempe, and associates. This approach has been used in many seminal studies of the role of vitreous in various disease states.18 However, there has not been widespread use of this approach, probably because it is heavily dependent upon subjective interpretation of the findings and there is thus unreliable reproducibility from facility to facility. It would be desirable to have a method of determining the presence or absence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) that is more objective. Furthermore, there have been no studies correlating preset lens biomicroscopy findings in patients suspected of having a posterior vitreous detachment with some type of corroborating evaluation, such as histology or intraoperative findings. 3.2.2.OphthalmoscopyOf all the parts of the eye that are routinely evaluated by clinical inspection, the vitreous is perhaps the least amenable to standard examination techniques. This is because, as previously mentioned, examining thr vitreous is an attempt to visualize a structure designed to be virtually invisible.19 With the direct ophthalmoscope, light rays emanating from a point in the patient’s fundus emerge as a parallel beam that is focused on the observer’s retina and an image is formed. However, incident light reaches only the part of the fundus onto which the image of the light source falls and only light from the fundus area onto which the observer’s pupil is imaged reaches that pupil. Thus the fundus can be seen only where the observed and the illuminated areas overlap and where the light source and the observer’s pupil are aligned optically. This restricts the extent of the examined area. Also, because of a limited depth of field, this method is rarely used to assess the vitreous structure. Indirect ophthalmoscopy extends the field of view by using an intermediate lens to gather rays of light from a wider area of the fundus. Although binocularity provides stereopsis, the image size is considerably smaller than with direct ophthalmoscopy and only significant alterations in vitreous structure, such as the hole in the prepapillary posterior vitreous cortex (Fig. 7) that is visible after posterior vitreous detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, or asteroid hyalosis, are reliably diagnosed by indirect ophthalmoscopy. The scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO), also developed at the Schepens Eye Research Institute in Boston, enables dynamic inspection of the vitreous in vivo, features tremendous depth of field, and offers real-time recording of findings. Monochromatic green, as well as other wavelengths of light are also available for illumination.20 To date, however, the SLO has really only improved our ability to visualize details in the prepapillary posterior vitreous, such as Weiss’s ring (Fig. 8). In spite of the dramatic depth of field possible with this technique, the SLO does not adequately image the vitreous body and an attached posterior vitreous cortex, probably because of limitations in the level of resolution. Thus, posterior vitreous detachment, which is by far the most common diagnosis to be found when imaging the vitreous clinically, is not reliably determined by the SLO. Indeed, there is an increasing awareness among vitreous surgeons that the reliability of the clinical diagnosis of total posterior vitreous detachment by any existing technique is woefully inadequate. This awareness arises from the fact that vitreous surgery following clinical examination often reveals findings that are contradictory to preoperative assessments. 3.2.3.UltrasonographyUltrasound is an inaudible acoustic wave that has a frequency of more than 20 kHz. The frequencies used in ophthalmology are generally in the range of 8 to 10 MHz. Although these very high frequencies produce wavelengths as short as 0.2 mm, these are not short enough to adequately assess a normal internal vitreous structure such as the fibers described earlier. Even the posterior vitreous cortex, about 100 μ m at its thickest point in the normal state, is below the level of resolution of conventional ultrasonography. The utility of this technique results from the fact that strong echoes are produced at “acoustic” interfaces found at the junctions of media with different densities and sound velocities, and the greater the difference in density between the two media that create the acoustic interface, the more prominent the echo. Thus, age-related or pathological phase alterations within the vitreous body are detectable by ultrasonography. Oksala, who in the late 1950s and early 1960s was among the first to employ B-scan ultrasonography to image the vitreous, summarized his findings of aging changes in 1978.21 In that report of 444 “normal” subjects, Oksala defined the presence of acoustic interfaces within the vitreous body as evidence of vitreous aging and determined that the incidence of such interfaces was 5 between the ages of 21 and 40 years, and fully 80 for individuals over 60 years of age. In clinical practice, however, only relatively profound vitreous abnormalities such as asteroid hyalosis, vitreous hemorrhage, and intravitreal foreign bodies (if sufficiently large) are imaged by ultrasonography. At the vitreo–retinal interface, the presence of a posterior vitreous detachment is often suspected on the basis of B-scan ultrasonography but can never be definitively established, since the level of resolution is not sufficient to reliably image the posterior vitreous cortex, which is only a little more than 100 μ m thick at its thickest point. However, recent studies have successfully used this technique to determine the presence of a split in the posterior vitreous cortex, called vitreoschisis (Fig. 9), of patients with proliferative diabetic vitreoretinopathy.22 The success achieved in using ultrasound to identify this important pathological entity probably results from the fact that this tissue is abnormally thickened by nonenzymatic glycation of vitreous collagen and other proteins.22 In the absence of such advanced disease, however, the diagnosis of PVD cannot be definitively established by ultrasonography. 3.2.4.Optical coherence tomographyIntroduced in 1991, optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a new technique for high-resolution cross-sectional imaging of ocular structure.23 It is based on the principle of low coherence interferometry, where the distances between and sizes of structures in the eye are determined by measuring the “echo” time it takes for light to be backscattered from the different structures at various axial distances. The resolution of all echo-based instrumentation (such as ultrasound and OCT) is based upon the ratio of the speed of the incident wave to that of the reflected wave. As described earlier, clinical ultrasonography is performed with a frequency of approximately 10 Hz and has a 150-mm resolution. Although recently introduced ultrasound biomicroscopy has increased the frequency (up to 100 Hz), and thus has a spatial resolution of 20 μm, penetration into the eye is no more than 4 to 5 mm. Light-based devices, such as the OCT, use an incident wavelength of 800 nm and have increased axial resolution to 10 μm, providing excellent imaging of retinal architecture, although vitreous applications are less useful. The limitations of OCT include the inability to obtain high-quality images through opaque media, such as dense cataract or vitreous hemorrhage. The use of OCT is also limited to cooperative patients who are able to maintain fixation for the full acquisition time of 2.5 s per section. Thus, to date OCT has primarily been used to image, and to some extent quantitate, retinal laminar structure. Some vitreous applications have been useful, especially those that involve imaging the vitreo–macular interface in patients with macular holes24 (Fig. 10). However, the exact nature and molecular composition of these preretinal tissue planes cannot be definitively deduced using OCT, and little information can be garnered about structures within the vitreous body. 3.2.5.SpectroscopyNuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The NMR technique is based upon the fact that when placed in a magnetic field, magnetic nuclei, such as water protons, tend to orient their magnetic vectors along the direction of the magnetic field. The time constant for this orientation, known as the longitudinal relaxation time, T1, reflects the thermal interactions of protons with their molecular environment. Magnetic vectors that have previously been induced to be in phase with each other undergo a “dephasing” relaxation process that is measured by the transverse relaxation time, T2. It is the transverse relaxation time T2 that reflects inhomogeneities within the population of protons. Protons oriented by a magnetic field absorb radio waves of a frequency appropriate to induce transactions between their two orientations. Such absorption is the basis of the NMR signal used to index relaxation times. Relaxation times in biological tissues vary with the concentration and mobility of water within the tissue. Since the latter is influenced by the interaction of water molecules with macromolecules in the tissue, this noninvasive measure can assess the gel to liquid transformation that occurs in the vitreous during aging14 and disease states, such as diabetic vitreopathy.15 16 These considerations led Aguayo et al.;25 to use NMR to study the effects of pharmacological vitreolysis26 27 on bovine and human vitreous specimens and intact bovine eyes in vitro. Collagenase induced measurable vitreous liquefaction, more so than hyaluronidase (Fig. 11). Thus, this noninvasive method could be used to evaluate age and disease-induced synchisis (liquefaction) of the vitreous body, although it is not clear that this technique would adequately evaluate the vitreo–retinal interface. There have, curiously, been few recent studies that have employed NMR spectroscopy in research or clinical applications on the vitreous. Raman spectroscopy. This form of spectroscopy was first described in 1928 by C. V. Raman in India. Raman spectroscopy is an inelastic light-scattering technique in which molecules in the vibrational mode in the study specimen absorb energy from incident photons, causing a downward frequency shift, which is called the Raman shift. Because the signal is relatively quite weak, current techniques employ laser-induced stimulation with gradual increases in the wavelength of the stimulating laser so as to be able to detect the points at which the Raman signal becomes apparent as peaks superimposed on the broad background fluorescence. The wavelengths at which these peaks are elicited are characteristic of the chemical bonds, such as aliphatic C―H (2939 cm −1), water O―H (3350 cm −1), C=C and C―H stretching vibrations in π-conjugated and aromatic molecules (1604 cm −1 and 3057 cm −1) , etc. To date, most applications of this technique in the eye have been for analysis of lens structure and pathology.28 The use of near-infrared (IR) excitation wavelengths is particularly effective in the lens, since these wavelengths have better penetration in opacified cataractous lenses. Vitreous studies29 employed excised samples of human vitreous obtained during surgery. The near-IR excitation at 1064 nm was provided by a diode-pumped neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) continuous wave (cw) laser with a diameter of 0.1 mm and a power setting of 300 mW. Backscattering geometry with an optical lens collected scattered light, which was passed through a Rayleigh light rejection filter into a spectrophotometer. The results (Fig. 12) showed that this technique was able to detect peaks at 1604 and 3057 cm −1 in the vitreous of diabetic patients that were not present in controls. Further research and development is needed to reliably interpret such results and refine the methodology for noninvasive use in situ. While this has already been achieved in the lens, it is not clear that this will be possible for vitreous applications. 3.2.6.Dynamic light scatteringDynamic light scattering (DLS) is an established laboratory technique for measuring the average size (or size distribution) of microscopic particles as small as 3 nm in diameter that are suspended in a fluid medium where they undergo random Brownian motion. Light scattered by a laser beam passing through such a dispersion will have intensity fluctuations in proportion to the Brownian motion of the particles. Since the size of the particles influences their Brownian motion, analysis of the scattered light intensity yields a distribution of the size(s) of the suspended particles. Visible light from a laser diode (power 50 μW) is focused into a small scattering volume inside the specimen (excised lens or vitreous, autopsy or living eye). The detected signal is processed via a digital correlator to yield a time autocorrelation function (TCF). For dilute dispersions of spherical particles, the slope of the TCF provides a quick and accurate determination of the particle’s translational diffusion coefficient, which can be related to its size via a Stokes-Einstein equation, provided the viscosity of the suspending fluid, its temperature, and its refractive index are known. For the lens and vitreous, a viscosity of η=0.8904 centipoise, a refractive index of n=1.333, and a temperature of 25°C for in vitro studies and 37°C for in vivo studies were used to determine macromolecule sizes. Studies30 31 32 of the lens and vitreous have employed DLS instrumentation that was developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to conduct fluid physics experiments on-board the space shuttle and space station orbiters. The beam input from a semiconductor laser (670-nm wavelength) at 50 μW power was projected into the specimens and the scattered signal was collected by the DLS probe for 10 s. The signal was then detected by an avalanche photodiode detector system. A TCF was constructed using a digital correlator card. The slope of the TCF provides a measure of particle sizes in the selected measurement sites (volume=50 μm 3). Studies31 in the lens found that DLS was significantly more sensitive than Scheimpflug photography in detecting early changes in the lens. When the DLS probe was used to obtain measurements from the entire vitreous body, scanning was performed in conjunction with a micropositioning assembly, which controlled detector position in the x-, y-, and z -planes. This enabled semiautomated measurements from a sufficient number of sites within the bovine vitreous body to create a three-dimensional map of the distribution of the average particle sizes of vitreous macromolecules (Fig. 13). Furthermore, in studies32 of autopsy human eyes, DLS was able to detect the structural changes16 resulting from diabetic vitreopathy25 (Fig. 14). It is interesting that these DLS findings appear to corroborate the findings of dark-field slit microscopy (Fig. 6) where glycation of vitreous proteins resulted in cross-linking of collagen fibrils and aggregation into large bundles of fibrils. It is plausible that these are detected by DLS as particles of larger size with more variability than that seen in the nondiabetic control in this preliminary study. Future studies with more advanced instrumentation will determine if this phenomenon can be detected in a clinical setting, confirming these preliminary in vitro results. 4.ConclusionsNo single method at present exists that will provide accurate and reproducible noninvasive imaging of both the vitreous body and the vitreo–retinal interface. This significantly affects the ability to assess the effects of aging and disease and, in particular, the accuracy of clinical diagnoses of posterior vitreous detachment. Moreover, this limitation hinders our ability to adequately evaluate the role of the vitreous in vitreoretinal diseases such as retinal detachment, both in general terms and in specific clinical cases. Today, a combination of the techniques described here could provide considerably more information than any one technique. For example, NMR spectroscopy could assess the degree of vitreous liquefaction; dynamic light scattering could determine the concurrent aggregation of collagen and other macromolecules that occurs during liquefaction; Raman spectroscopy could identify the presence of specific molecular moieties that provide insight into pathogenesis; while optical coherence tomography could image the vitreo–retinal interface. It is hoped that, the future will witness the combination of these and other techniques in a single noninvasive instrument for research and clinical applications. REFERENCES
S. W. Duke-Elder
,
“The nature of the vitreous body,”
Br. J. Ophthamol. ,
(1930). Google Scholar
J. G. F. Worst
,
“Cisternal systems of the fully developed vitreous body in the young adult,”
Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK , 97 550
–554
(1977). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
and
E. A. Balazs
,
“Morphology and ultrastructure of human vitreous fibers,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. , 30 1867
–1871
(1989). Google Scholar
S. Kishi
and
K. Shimizu
,
“Posterior precortical vitreous pocket,”
Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago) , 108 979
(1990). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
, Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago) , 190 1059
(1991). Google Scholar
W. S. Foulds
,
“Is your vitreous really necessary? The role of the vitreous in the eye with particular reference to retinal attachment, detachment and the mode of action of vitreous substitutes,”
Eye , 1 641
–664
(1987). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
“Age-related differences in the human vitreo-retinal interface,”
Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago) , 109 966
–971
(1991). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
and
G. S. Hageman
,
“Interfaces,”
Eur. J. Ophthalmol. , 10 1
–3
(2000). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
and
E. A. Balazs
,
“Human vitreous fibres and vitreoretinal disease,”
Trans. Ophthalm. Soc. UK , 104 123
(1985). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
“Age-related changes in human vitreous structure,”
Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. , 225 89
–93
(1987). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
“Diabetic vitreopathy” (guest editorial,”
Ophthalmology , 103 205
–206
(1996). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
“Abnormalities of human vitreous structure in diabetes,”
Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. , 231 257
–260
(1993). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
B. Buckingham
,
M. A. Charles
, and
K. Reiser
,
“Biochemical abnormalities in vitreous of humans with proliferative diabetic retinopathy,”
Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago) , 110 1472
–1479
(1992). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
“Classifying posterior vitreous detachment—a new way to look at the invisible,”
Br. J. Ophthamol. , 81 521
–522
(1997). Google Scholar
M. A. Mainster
,
G. T. Timberlake
,
R. H. Webb
, and
G. W. Hughes
,
“Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy—clinical applications,”
Ophthalmology , 89 852
–857
(1982). Google Scholar
A. Oksala
,
“Ultrasonic findings in the vitreous body at various ages,”
Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. , 207 275
–280
(1978). Google Scholar
T. Chu
,
P. F. Lopez
,
M. R. Cano
, and
R. L. Green
,
“Posterior vitreoschisis—an echographic finding in proliferative diabetic retinopathy,”
Ophthalmology , 103 315
–322
(1996). Google Scholar
J. G. Fujimoto
,
M. E. Brezinski
,
G. J. Tearney
et al.;,
“Optical biopsy and imaging using optical coherence tomography,”
Nat. Med. , 1 970
–972
(1995). Google Scholar
A. Gaudric
,
B. Haouchine
,
P. Massin
et al.;,
“Macular hole formation—new data provided by optical coherence tomography,”
Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago) , 117 744
–751
(1999). Google Scholar
J. Aguayo
,
B. Glaser
,
A. Mildvan
et al.;,
“Study of vitreous liquifaction by NMR spectroscopy and imaging,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. , 26 692
–697
(1985). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
“Pharmacologic vitreolysis,” (guest editorial,”
Retina , 18 1
–3
(1998). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
“Is pharmacologic vitreolysis brewing?” (guest editorial,”
Retina , 22 1
–3
(2002). Google Scholar
S. Nie
,
K. L. Bergbauer
,
J. F. R. Kuck Jr.,
and
N. T. Yu
,
“Near infrared Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy in human lens research,”
Exp. Eye Res. , 51 619
–623
(1990). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
S. Nie
,
K. A. Reiser
,
M. A. Charles
, and
N. T. Yu
,
“Raman spectroscopy of human vitreous in proliferative diabetic retinopathy,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. , 35 2976
–2980
(1994). Google Scholar
R. R. Ansari
,
S. Dunker
,
K. Suh
,
N. Kitaya
, and
J. Sebag
,
“Quantitative molecular characterization of bovine vitreous and lens with non-invasive dynamic light scattering,”
Exp. Eye Res. , 73 859
–866
(2001). Google Scholar
R. R. Ansari
,
M. B. Datiles III
,
J. F. King
, and
D. Leftwood
,
“Measuring lens opacity: combining quasi-elastic light scattering with Scheimpflug imaging system,”
Proc. SPIE , 3246 35
–43
(1998). Google Scholar
J. Sebag
,
R. R. Ansari
,
S. Dunker
, and
S. I. Suh
,
“Dynamic light scattering of diabetic vitreopathy,”
Diabetes Technol. Therap. , 1 169
–176
(1999). Google Scholar
|
CITATIONS
Cited by 37 scholarly publications.
Vitreous
Optical fibers
Eye
Optical coherence tomography
Ultrasonography
Raman spectroscopy
Interfaces